EXACTLY WHAT ARE COMMON RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FDI IN THE MENA REGION

Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Blog Article

Recent research shows the significant role that cultural differences play in the success or of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf.



Although governmental uncertainty seems to dominate media coverage regarding the Middle East, in recent years, the region—and particularly the Arabian Gulf—has seen a steady increase in foreign direct investment (FDI). The Middle East and Arab Gulf markets have become rapidly appealing for FDI. However, the existing research on what multinational corporations perceive area specific risks is scarce and frequently does not have insights, a well known fact lawyers and risk professionals like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would probably know about. Studies on risks associated with FDI in the region tend to overstate and predominantly focus on governmental dangers, such as for instance government uncertainty or policy modifications that may influence investments. But lately research has begun to shed a light on a a crucial yet often overlooked factor, particularly the consequences of social facets regarding the sustainability of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf. Indeed, a number of studies reveal that many companies and their management teams considerably neglect the effect of cultural differences, due mainly to deficiencies in knowledge of these social factors.

Pioneering scientific studies on dangers connected to international direct investments in the MENA region offer fresh insights, trying to bridge the gap in empirical knowledge about the risk perceptions and management strategies of Western multinational corporations active widely in the region. As an example, research project involving a few major worldwide businesses in the GCC countries revealed some interesting data. It suggested that the risks connected with foreign investments are even more complicated than just political or exchange rate risks. Cultural risks are perceived as more essential than governmental, economic, or economic risks in accordance with survey data . Additionally, the research unearthed that while elements of Arab culture strongly influence the business environment, numerous foreign businesses struggle to adapt to regional traditions and routines. This difficulty in adapting constitutes a danger dimension that will require further investigation and a change in how multinational corporations operate in the region.

Focusing on adjusting to regional culture is necessary but not enough for effective integration. Integration is a loosely defined concept involving several things, such as appreciating local values, learning about decision-making styles beyond a restricted transactional business perspective, and looking into societal norms that influence company practices. In GCC countries, effective business interactions are more than just transactional interactions. What influences employee motivation and job satisfaction differ greatly across cultures. Hence, to genuinely integrate your business in the Middle East a few things are essential. Firstly, a corporate mind-set shift in risk management beyond financial risk management tools, as consultants and solicitors such as Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would probably recommend. Next, techniques that can be efficiently implemented on the ground to translate the new mindset into practice.

Report this page